Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Jun 1999 12:30:52 -0700 (PDT) | From | "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <> | Subject | Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? |
| |
Hello Harald, your words below sound very simular to those spoken by many people that have over clocked their cpu's . I beleive that your cpu may have been mis-marked 450Mhz , and of course s/b marked 400Mhz or so. Twys, JimL PS: sounds like very shoddy quality control. :-{
On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Harald Koenig wrote: > On Jun 18, Harald Koenig wrote: > > compared with 2*27 perfect kernel builds with 2.2.5, now I'm pretty sure > > it's not a hardware bug on my side. > update: I'm no longer sure that it's a kernel problem in my case. > after reducing the CPU clock from 450 to 400 MHz I've now compiled > >2*100 kernels using 2.2.10 with no single problem at all. > so maybe it was just a hardware problem for me -- or it's some weird race > which doesn't show up for 400 but only for 450 MHz ?! I can't believe that yet... > Harald +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS | | Network Engineer | 25416 22nd So | Give me Linux | | babydr@baby-dragons.com | DesMoines WA 98198 | only on AXP | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |