Messages in this thread | | | From | "Chris Smith" <> | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea | Date | Sun, 20 Jun 1999 10:39:57 -0600 |
| |
> I follow up this discussion a while and don't know why there are so many > concerns: > > 1st: it is a _module_ i.e. It does not bloat the kernel! > 2nd: it would help embedded stuff very much > 3rd: when you don't need it, don't load the module
Okay, fine with me. My only concern is that Alan Cox's excellent ideas for a more general capability might get lost. But I don't want to stop anyone from writing khttpd -- and I couldn't if I did want to. I'm just giving an opinion on how useful it will be, in hopes that my thoughts may be useful.
Chris Smith
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |