Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:28:20 -0700 (PDT) | From | Dan Hollis <> | Subject | Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about |
| |
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Marek Habersack wrote: > > I've used both an in-kernel http server and boa for an embedded system and > > boa was much cleaner. > It's probably a much cleaner solution, yes, but not always faster and more > efficient both in terms of space and time. But the in-kernel implementation > is suitable mostly for the embedded systems, IMO.
Exactly. In-kernel http is lower memory profile, simpler, and faster. All are major issues in embedded systems.
-Dan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |