lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > I've used both an in-kernel http server and boa for an embedded system and
> > boa was much cleaner.
> It's probably a much cleaner solution, yes, but not always faster and more
> efficient both in terms of space and time. But the in-kernel implementation
> is suitable mostly for the embedded systems, IMO.

Exactly. In-kernel http is lower memory profile, simpler, and faster.
All are major issues in embedded systems.

-Dan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.078 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site