lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: reschedule_idle
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Rik van Riel wrote:

>- new tasks are placed on an idle CPU, this is always good
> (now that I think of it, new tasks are always penalized
> in goodness() -- should we consider this harmful?)

I think the processor heuristic is a per-task thing. The tsk->mm heuristic
instead should takes care of CLONE_VM childs. But there's to say that
PROC_CHANGE_PENALITY weight (== 15 on i386) is very higher than the
next->mm == prev->mm weight (== 1 on all ports) ...

Andrea Arcangeli


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:2.503 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site