Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 May 1999 22:37:28 -0400 | From | Raul Miller <> | Subject | Re: fork() Problem? |
| |
Richard B. Johnson <root@chaos.analogic.com> wrote: > No it does not. It means, exactly what it says. It says that the > type is that of the left operand (promotion rules) and the value > is the value stored in the left operand after the assignment has > taken place. It says nothing more.
Er.. but if that value is 0 then that value is 0.
> Even 'gcc' knows that the operation is incorrect, but you have to > turn on -Wall.
Just because -Wall gives you a warning doesn't mean that the practice violates ansi c.
If you disagree, please provide some reference to back up your point, don't just keep repeating yourself.
-- Raul
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |