lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 48 day uptime problem?
Bob McElrath wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 1999, Steven Roberts wrote:
> > Which Is this known to be a 2.2 issue? I'm running 2.0.35 on an old
> > multi which has an uptime of 91 days. Only glich is netstat spewing
> > unaligned traps every now and again, but other than that, running
> > great. The machine is a user/mail/web/ftp server so it gets a fair
> > amount of network traffic.
>
> If you have an uptime of 91 days, and network stuff still works, I suppose
> that's conclusive evidince that it's in 2.2 only. Examine the patch to be
> sure though...

That is what I figured, but since I hadn't seen a statement saying 2.2
bug, figured I should let people know it looks like the breakage was in
2.2 not 2.0

Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.055 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site