Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 May 1999 10:52:19 -0400 | From | James Michael Keller <> | Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Linux name in BAD taste |
| |
Matthew Vanecek wrote: > > alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 May 1999, Thomas E. Dodd /CSDC wrote: > > > > > The site www.linuxhq.org has a home page with extremely vulgar > > > language. This is definatly not the image that should be associated > > > with linux. > > > > I just looked. WHAT *vulgar* langauge? > > > > Cheers, > > Alex. > > > > That's what I was wondering. All I saw was regret that linuxhq.com had > disappeared, and an inquiry about the location of the pages' sources > that were there. I sent him a pointer to kernelnotes.org, which seems > to be linuxhq.com's replacement. >
Speaking of that - what the heck happend with that? How did it get yanked after two years? Everything I've heard has been very vuage at best. -- ---------------------+--------------------------------------- James Michael Keller | jmkeller@radix.net "Tech" | http://www.radix.net/~jmkeller ---------------------+--------------------------------------- "Linux is not a destination, it is simply an open road to tomorrow" ------------------------------------------------------------- Contents (c)1999 James Michael Keller -------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |