Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 May 1999 20:53:52 -0500 (CDT) | From | Adam Heath <> | Subject | Excessively long turn-around times(27 hours???) |
| |
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (root) by doogie.p2.private.novare.net with esmtp (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian)) id 10kzQ8-0007oj-04; Fri, 21 May 1999 19:13:44 -0500 Received: from mail.novare.net by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.0.1) for adam-novare@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 21 May 1999 19:13:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from master.debian.org (qmailr@master.debian.org [209.41.108.5]) by mail.novare.net (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id TAA26022 for <doogie@novare.net>; Fri, 21 May 1999 19:13:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 2990 invoked by uid 1128); 22 May 1999 00:13:03 -0000 Delivered-To: doogie@debian.org Received: (qmail 2968 invoked from network); 22 May 1999 00:13:02 -0000 Received: from listserv.funet.fi (128.214.248.27) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 22 May 1999 00:13:02 -0000 Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:35083 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by listserv.funet.fi with ESMTP id <19918-8110>; Sat, 22 May 1999 02:57:47 +0300 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <S.rFPZh168850>; Fri, 21 May 1999 15:52:13 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <S.rFI7W161215>; Fri, 21 May 1999 07:24:18 -0400 Received: from ns3.novare.net ([209.176.56.190]:64105 "EHLO doogie.p2.private.novare.net") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <S.rF5WP217574>; Thu, 20 May 1999 17:03:23 -0400 Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (adam) by doogie.p2.private.novare.net with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian)) id 10kZrp-0005Fr-00; Thu, 20 May 1999 15:56:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 15:56:37 -0500 (CDT) From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> --- (please forgive any line wraps above)
It took an email I sent 27 hours to return to me. Looking at the headers, it appears that vger sat on the email almost 90%(est) of the time. The vger setup may have the best exploder config in the world, but if the main machine isn't dolling them out fast enough, what is the point?
I know this comes up every so often, and usually cvs is just turned off, until the queue has time to catch up. That doesn't fix the problem, tho. Cvs and these lists should not be on the same box. cvs should not be on a box with anything else(should cvs even be?).
Adam(very aggravated that kernel development is so hampered)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |