Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 May 1999 21:17:14 -0500 (CDT) | From | Oliver Xymoron <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] copy_strings cleanup for 2.3.2 |
| |
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So copy_strings would be something like > > > > int copy_strings(int argc, char *const*argv, &bprm) > > > > instead of > > > > unsigned long copy_strings(.. horror-arguments ..) > > > > no? > > I didn't do it at first because I thought copy_strings is general purpose > enough that it may be someday used for something else than just with > binformats, but at a closer look you're right: it is unlikely that it > will ever happen and it is not worth the complexity.
If you wanted to leave it generic, an inline function wrapper would do the trick nicely.
-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |