Messages in this thread | | | From | "Michael H. Warfield" <> | Subject | Re: 2.3.x wish list? | Date | Mon, 17 May 1999 15:19:17 -0400 (EDT) |
| |
Michael B. Trausch enscribed thusly: > On Thu, 13 May 1999, G. Sumner Hayes wrote:
> > mark@hoist.nlcomm.com wrote:
> > > 40-bit encryption isn't. Why not just put 40 bit as the default > > > in the kernel, but require patching to get any higher.
> > Any encryption is illegal for export from the US without a license. > > Licenses are routinely granted for export of binaries that only use > > 40-bit crypto, but AFAIK they aren't granted for source code at all > > (barring special circumstances), even with 40-bit crypto.
> > The 9th Circuit court's ruling may eventually make it legal to export > > source code with crypto in it, but that ruling doesn't apply to > > binaries as far as I can tell. Besides, there's still a Supreme Court
> It affects only those binaries that have source code -- the ruling is > based on source code as a language (even though it's not a spoken language > --- the judge rules it under freedom of speech). From what I read, the > 9th Circuit court ruling is the law until the US Supreme Court overturns > it -- period. And I have a feeling that it will NOT be overturned by the > supreme court.
It's under stay pending a decision on appeal. As things stand right now, no, it's still not legal.
[...]
Mike -- Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 925-8248 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |