lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.8_andrea1.bz2
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >correct, there are no changes in getblk() 2.2.7 -> 2.2.8. however, if
> >flushtime is no longer relevant, then this piece of code is now
>
> Ah ok, that was my complain too but I think that flushtime is been killed
> by mistake. Note also that with a better design you won't need to set
> flushtime to zero anymore. Look at my buffer.c to see my redesign of
> flushtime.

agreed -- checking buffer_dirty in getblk() is a kludge.

- Chuck Lever
--
corporate: <chuckl@netscape.com>
personal: <chucklever@netscape.net> or <cel@monkey.org>

The Linux Scalability project:
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.448 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site