Messages in this thread | | | From | "Albert D. Cahalan" <> | Subject | Re: USB script | Date | Fri, 30 Apr 1999 13:35:45 -0400 (EDT) |
| |
Dominik Kubla writes: > On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 05:52:50PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >> Dominik Kubla writes:
>>> UPID=`ps -C uhci-control -o pid --no-headers` >> >> That is almost what I initially thought: >> UPID=`ps -C uhci-control -o pid=` >> (if all column heads are empty, no header line is printed) > > Haven't checked it, but would > > UID=`ps -u root -C uhci-control -o pid=` > > work? If -u and -C can not yet be specified together, would it make > sense to allow it in the a futher version of ps ?
That does not work the way you might want it to work. As required by standards, you get BOTH root-owned processes and processes named "uhci-control".
I have indeed thought about adding an option to change the logic.
This is fairly good:
UID=`ps --sort=ruid -C uhci-control -o pid= | head -1`
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |