Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:54:57 -0600 | From | Otto Solares <> | Subject | Re: Performance Comparision |
| |
Alan Cox wrote:
> > resume it gives you the potential a system have. I suppose > > that linux have a very well designed and basic memory > > management but this is not true. Linux outperforms the others > > The Linux MM is very good at some things and not good at others. Its > algorithms for selecting swap pages are definitely improveable. However > it is lighter for many things than other OSs and that often more than makes > up for it > > > Quips and FreeBSD in the same machine 13M net quips. FreeBSD > > takes 2.5 hours to complete the test and linux in both kernels takes > > 5 hours ( ?? :( ) The Windoze machine never complete the test > > Thats not a meaningful test btw. The glibc headers take longer to compile > because of all the extensive standards features and optimisations. > > A valid compile test would be to build say the BSD ones with a BSD > target compiler on BSD and Linux. > > Alan
Well, this are the facts with the same hardware different OS.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |