Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:21:19 -0400 (EDT) | From | Steve Willer <> | Subject | Re: [Linux-Perf] Re: [big performances boost for DataBases] Re: cache killer memory death test - 2.0 vs 2.2 vs arca - programs inside |
| |
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> If you want I can still produce a standalone page-cache-per-inode rb-tree > patch, but the only difference between the version just benchmarked by > Chuck and my current RB-tree code is that now I inlined everything (maybe > it will be a bit worse or a bit better but not a big issue also > considering that it's common code...).
I would definitely appreciate a standalone patch. It's always best to eliminate as many variables as possible when performance testing, and I would frankly trust a smaller patch more. No offense, but the fewer changes, the fewer likely introduced bugs.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |