lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Linux-Perf] Re: [big performances boost for DataBases] Re: cache killer memory death test - 2.0 vs 2.2 vs arca - programs inside

On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> If you want I can still produce a standalone page-cache-per-inode rb-tree
> patch, but the only difference between the version just benchmarked by
> Chuck and my current RB-tree code is that now I inlined everything (maybe
> it will be a bit worse or a bit better but not a big issue also
> considering that it's common code...).

I would definitely appreciate a standalone patch. It's always best to
eliminate as many variables as possible when performance testing, and I
would frankly trust a smaller patch more. No offense, but the fewer
changes, the fewer likely introduced bugs.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:2.264 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site