Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: Fram Buffer support | Date | Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:18:25 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> It also occured to me if we move 2D and 3D support into a generic interface > in conjunction with the frame buffer we would only ever need one X server > that would be fully integrated with one OpenGl app. There could > also be software 2D and 3D support for those CPU with not enough > power. > > Who do I need to talk to this about? Is the frame buffer heading in > this direction?
It is heading in exactly the opposite direction. Clever board specific stuff for acceleration can mostly live in the Xserver. XFree is heading towards a single server with loadable driver objects.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |