Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Apr 1999 13:44:58 +0100 (GMT) | From | Riley Williams <> | Subject | Re: Fun topic: name that branch! |
| |
Hi all.
>> 0.* tso >> 1.0.* drew >> 1.1.* hawes >> 1.2.* sct >> 1.3.* ingo >> 2.0.* alan >> 2.1.* linus >> 2.2.* davem
> Wouldn't it make more sense to use a logical naming scheme > (boring yes)
> stable-1996 > unstable-1996
> etc by year of x.y.0
Why bother with years - use something easily predictable, such as...
0.* lx-0 1.0.* lx-1-0 1.1.* lx-1-1 1.2.* lx-1-2 1.3.* lx-1-3 2.0.* lx-2-0 2.1.* lx-2-1 2.2.* lx-2-2 2.3.* lx-2-3
Best wishes from Riley.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux | | development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, | | in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone | | else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ * ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux * http://www.MemAlpha.cx/kernel.versions.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |