lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: routing behaviour change between 2.2 and 2.0? Why?
Date
In article <cistron.199904102033.AAA15064@mordor.ccssu.crimea.ua>,
Oleg Drokin <green@ccssu.ccssu.crimea.ua> wrote:
>And all work as expected, packets go to 62.244.13.19.
>then dialin PPP connection appears, with remote addres being 195.5.61.202
>new route added and rouuting table is now:
>ccssu:~# route -n | grep 202
>195.5.61.202 62.244.13.19 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
>195.5.61.202 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp1

Well that's not valid default route. That's a host route, should be
a network route like this:

drinkel% route -n
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
195.64.64.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ippp0
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 ippp0

Mike.
--
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.120 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site