Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Mar 1999 01:32:01 -0500 (EST) | From | Gregory Maxwell <> | Subject | Re: ext2fs sparse superblock |
| |
I use it on quite a few heavily used systems.
It seems quite stable, but it isn't backwards compatible with old systems..
The only 'problem' I've had with it was that a FS that some fool mkswapped was a bit harder to recover (just because I didn't know what the second or thrid superblock backup address was off the top of my head)..
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> How stable is this? > > I've enabled it for a large and heavily accessed disk to do some stress > testing. The files on it are not particularly important -- it's a cache disk > for squid proxy. I'll post results to the list if there isn't much feedback > from others. > > -- > Brian Ristuccia > brianr@osiris.978.org > bristucc@baynetworks.com > bristucc@cs.uml.edu > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |