lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: loopback devices are not freeed on umount


On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

>
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> > If I mount a floppy image or an iso image trough loopback for example:
> > mount boot.img t -o loop=/dev/loop0
> > and then umount it with:
> > umount t
> > or:
> > umount /dev/loop0
> > The loopback module usage count stays 1 in /proc/modules
> > also I cannot mount another image thorugh /dev/loop0 cause it's still in
> > use acording to the kernel.
>
> this is intended behaviour and a userspace issue in any case. Let me
> explain:
>
> mount -o loop is a shortcut which actually does an intelligent "losetup"
> followed by a "mount /dev/loopN". When you unmount it, it does not run
> a "losetup -d". It should not, as I (for one) use losetup manually to
> mess around with loop devices and I would not like unmount to delete my
> loop devices for me.
>
> Andries, how do you feel about an extension to mtab to have a "loop"
> option in the options field so that unmount can know to delete it if it
> was created by mount? I realise this won't work for people who symlink
> /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts.
>
> (Example:
>
> /dev/loop0 /mnt/test ext2 rw 0 0
> /dev/loop1 /mnt/test2 ext2 rw,loop 0 0
>
> here, loop1 would be automatically deleted and loop0 would not be.)
>
I understand thanks for the info, maybe a note somewhere in the kernel
docs about losetup would be nice.

yes it's in make config's help no it's not in Documentation ;)

Regards,

Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.025 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site