Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:04:40 -0500 (EST) | From | "Mike A. Harris" <> | Subject | Re: Philosophical issue type thing.... |
| |
On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Alan Olsen wrote:
>> In recent incantations we've got what are called 'kernel threads' -- >> Really what they amount to are a little piece of the micro-kernel world >> sneaking into the macro-kernel of Linux. >> >> I'm not saying this is bad, just interesting. The point I'm making is >> that if things are working towards clustered computing, Micro-kernels >> have a distinct advantage in this arena. The MACH 4 micro-kernel (of >> which I have not been keeping tabs) would be better modified into a >> fully-cluster-aware-and-capable system than taking the existing Linux >> base. >> >> Last I knew MACH was a semi-stable micro-k... That was a year or so >> ago. >> >> Just an interesting thought blurb... Are we heading towards a >> micro-kernel? > >Actually the goal is to fold Wine into the kernel eventually. I figure it >should be done around kernel version 6.6.6.
HAHAHAHAHAH! ROTFLMAOPIMP!!!
;o)
>> Linus, Alan, Anyone? > >Oops... Wrong Alan. ]:>
;o)
-- Mike A. Harris Linux advocate GNU advocate Computer Consultant Open Source advocate
The DVORAK keyboard layout RULES! I memorized it in 45 minutes and I don't think I'm ever going back to QWERTY!
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |