Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 6 Mar 1999 16:54:15 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] sleep_on() fixes, 2.2.3-1 |
| |
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >+#define __wait_event_interruptible(wq, condition) \ > > Here I think we could add a third param to the macro, that will be the > retval in the interrupted case. It's zero cost and looks nicer to me.
the macro returns a value just like a function. I chose it because we usually prefer return values instead of side-effects. And it's not mandatory to use the return value.
-- mingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |