lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: OFFTOPIC: New MBR and partitioning standard?
Date
From
Dave Cinege <dcinege@psychosis.com> said:
> Isn't it about time the x86 platform supported more then 4 'real'
> partitions?

That is just a DOS limitation, AFAIU. Linux is happy living completely in
"extended" partitions.

> I'm getting really sick of this limitation and was thinking of sitting down
> with some peers, drafting a new extended MBR standard, then submitting it OS
> vendors.

The current partition scheme allows for further partitions via the kludgey
"extended" stuff. You'd have to stay backwards-compatible there too... and
that gets just too painful: You'd have to record the other (>= 4)
partitions twice.

BTW, there are several decent partition layouts, f.ex. BSD. Linux just
doesn't use any of them on ia32 (at least by default) to be able to coexist
with DOS et al. On SPARC it uses Sun's partition scheme, etc. I suspect
this was one of the factors that made Linux the most popular free OS, not
one of the *BSDs.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.155 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site