Messages in this thread | | | From | CaT <> | Subject | Re: [OFFTOPIC]: MS Porting Office to Linux? | Date | Fri, 19 Mar 1999 01:05:18 +1100 (EST) |
| |
Horst von Brand wrote the following: > > CaT <cat@zip.com.au> said: > > Harald Koenig wrote the following: > > [...] > > > > so, when will glibc 2.1 really be available and which "political issues" > > > have to be worked out (for more than a month now) ? > > AFAIU, the trouble is that it won't build with gcc-2.8.1
As I basically said in a private mail: So what?
> > Yeah. I'm kinda suprised about that not being resolved yet. Basically > > you had to have been lucky. Either you got it before it was withdrawn, > > you managed to find it in some dark corner of the net or you managed > > to get it off a friend who got it. Other then that you're SOL. > > ftp://sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/glibc/, currently 2.1.1pre1
Yup. Got told about that. Thought the official site was ftp.gnu.org. Now I know better. :)
Thanks to all who told me better. :)
-- CaT (cat@zip.net.au) URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null
An electricity provider of New Hampshire, US has advised it's customers that in the event of a power failure they can log on to its website for more information... - Paraphrased from the New Scientist, Feb 6, 1999
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |