Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:58:58 -0500 (EST) | From | "Mark H. Wood" <> | Subject | Re: Duplicate routes |
| |
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:09:02 -0000 (GMT), > Simon Kenyon <simon@koala.ie> wrote: > >why are these routes being created automatically > >can they not be created manually? > >is this automatic creation considered a feature (a good? feature) > >what is the rationale? > > They are *not* duplicate routes, even though they look like it. > Compare the output below from route -n and iproute list. The entries
What's an "iproute"? Is that anything like "ip route", which a few people have been telling us to use? I just looked in my 2.2.1 tree, and the only mention I find of "iproute" is in networking/policy-routing.txt (which likely isn't read by anybody not interested in policy routing) and routing.txt, which says nothing about route being broken or deprecated. Maybe this is why so many people are confused.
-- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mwood@IUPUI.Edu Specializing in unusual perspectives for more than twenty years.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |