Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.2.1 scheduler behavior | From | Claude Gamache <> | Date | 19 Feb 1999 18:13:52 -0500 |
| |
Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org> writes:
> > > > In the scheduler, is the PROC_CHANGE_PENALTY is large enough, is it > > something else ? > > It could have something to do with that. Once 2.2.2 comes > out (solving my reboot problems) I'll be working on a new > (or adapted) Linux scheduler that should solve all these > problems and possibly have less overhead than the current > one. > > > Is there something to do to adress this ? > > Not yet, you'll have to wait for the patch... > cheers, > > Rik -- If a Microsoft product fails, who do you sue?
I am greatly interested, if I can help you in any way, please let me know.
Claude
-- Claude Gamache, CAE Electronique Ltee, 8585 Cote-de-Liesse Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada H4T 1G6 Email: cgamache@cae.ca Tel.: (514) 341-2000 x3194, Fax: (514) 734-5612
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |