lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.2.1 scheduler behavior
From
Date
Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org> writes:

> >
> > In the scheduler, is the PROC_CHANGE_PENALTY is large enough, is it
> > something else ?
>
> It could have something to do with that. Once 2.2.2 comes
> out (solving my reboot problems) I'll be working on a new
> (or adapted) Linux scheduler that should solve all these
> problems and possibly have less overhead than the current
> one.
>
> > Is there something to do to adress this ?
>
> Not yet, you'll have to wait for the patch...
> cheers,
>
> Rik -- If a Microsoft product fails, who do you sue?

I am greatly interested, if I can help you in any way, please let me
know.

Claude

--
Claude Gamache, CAE Electronique Ltee, 8585 Cote-de-Liesse
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada H4T 1G6
Email: cgamache@cae.ca Tel.: (514) 341-2000 x3194, Fax: (514) 734-5612

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.074 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site