Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: Q: void* vs. unsigned long | Date | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:46:47 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> > - The rank of long long int shall be greater than the > > rank of long int, which shall be greater than the rank > > of int, which shall be greater than the rank of short > > int, which shall be greater than the rank of signed > > char. > > Interesting, so this tells that: > > rank(long long int) > rank(long int) > rank(int) > rank(short int) > rank(char) > > While following was the previous definition: > > rank(long long int) >= rank(long int) >= rank(int) >= rank(short int) >= rank(char)
If that definition has been changed the C9X committee are broken. On X86 for example short=long in size. Anyone who expects all the compilers to change their object sizes is to say the least misguided
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |