lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Q: void* vs. unsigned long
Date
> >           - The rank of long long int shall  be  greater  than  the
> > rank of long int, which shall be greater than the rank
> > of int, which shall be greater than the rank of short
> > int, which shall be greater than the rank of signed
> > char.
>
> Interesting, so this tells that:
>
> rank(long long int) > rank(long int) > rank(int) > rank(short int) > rank(char)
>
> While following was the previous definition:
>
> rank(long long int) >= rank(long int) >= rank(int) >= rank(short int) >= rank(char)

If that definition has been changed the C9X committee are broken. On X86
for example short=long in size. Anyone who expects all the compilers to
change their object sizes is to say the least misguided




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.062 / U:0.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site