lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Interrupts not being raised.
    Date
    From
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > Adding an 'enable_irq(irq)' after registering the IRQ provokes the
    > > kernel into saying "enable_irq() unbalanced from 00000009", but doesn't
    ^^^^^^^^^
    > > actually make it work.
    >
    > a registered IRQ is automatically enabled.

    The underlined address sounds as if you compiled your kenrel using
    "-f omit-frame-pointer". There is a gcc bug in builtin_return_address
    when that option is enabled.

    Roger.

    --
    ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
    *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
    * Never blow in a cat's ear because if you do, usually after three or *
    * four times, they will bite your lips! And they don't let go for at *
    * least a minute. -- Lisa Coburn, age 9

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:3.448 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site