Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:56:53 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: timer_bh behaviour incorrect for 2.2.13? |
| |
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> You can borrow solution from softnet. It accumulates once ran softirqs > to mask and exit only when all pending BHs are ran once.
yep, although i think this does not solve William's problem: if TIMER_BH gets marked by a timer interrupt _after_ it has been run, then we miss the event.
-- mingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |