Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 5 Dec 1999 17:06:18 +0100 | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | Re: Small fix in buffer cache |
| |
> >I think it's cleaner to have those buffers attached... > The only advantage is for SYSRQ+M. I don't think it worth to make things > slower for it. I don't think those slowing will be noticable but I agree that current state doesn't require it.
> >From a code (not debug) point of view IMHO it would be cleaner to remove > all the not necessary stuff (so keeping only one dirty lru list for > kflushd/kupdate). I think we'll have to have at least one other list with all buffers for things like invalidate_buffers().
Honza.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |