lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Small fix in buffer cache
> >I think it's cleaner to have those buffers attached...
> The only advantage is for SYSRQ+M. I don't think it worth to make things
> slower for it.
I don't think those slowing will be noticable but I agree that current state
doesn't require it.

> >From a code (not debug) point of view IMHO it would be cleaner to remove
> all the not necessary stuff (so keeping only one dirty lru list for
> kflushd/kupdate).
I think we'll have to have at least one other list with all buffers for things
like invalidate_buffers().

Honza.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.071 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site