Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 29 Dec 1999 12:47:01 -0600 | From | Bill Wendling <> | Subject | Re: wait_on_irq, CPU1 |
| |
Also sprach Andi Kleen: } --- linux-2.2.13/arch/i386/lib/kbacktrace.c.NOSHOW Wed Dec 29 02:43:22 1999 } +++ linux-2.2.13/arch/i386/lib/kbacktrace.c Wed Dec 29 13:08:41 1999 } @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ } +/* } + Generic backtrace for i386. } + Based on the code in i386/kernel/traps.c, but with accurate module checking and does } + not require an frame pointer on the stack. } + } + Hacked by Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>. } + Should call to kdb if available. } + Subject to the GPL. } + */ [snip...]
} + module_start = PAGE_OFFSET + (max_mapnr << PAGE_SHIFT); } + module_start = ((module_start + VMALLOC_OFFSET) & ~(VMALLOC_OFFSET-1)); } + } + i = 1; } + while (((long) stack & (8192-1)) != 0) { ^^^^ Would it be a better idea to use a #defined value here (and in other places) such as THREAD_SIZE to avoid confusion? Just a suggestion. Cheers, Bill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |