Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [rfc] __SMP__ vs. CONFIG_SMP | Date | Mon, 27 Dec 1999 12:45:30 +1100 |
| |
In message <199912260312.VAA23979@duracef.shout.net> you write: > But if you want to write up a partial patch (like arch/i386 and > include/i386) and submit it to Linus and get his opinion, go for it.
Note that Linus doesn't eat such patches easily. I submitted a s/__SMP__/CONFIG_SMP/ patch some months ago and it went nowhere.
CONFIG_SMP everywhere: easier for external module compilation...
Rusty. -- Hacking time.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |