Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 25 Dec 1999 15:44:14 -0500 (EST) | From | Chris Noe <> | Subject | [rfc] __SMP__ vs. CONFIG_SMP |
| |
IIRC, at some point there was a certain reason why __SMP__ was used in certain places rather than CONFIG_SMP. I know that CONFIG_SMP didn't even exist until recently, but I wonder if there is a clear distinction between the two? ie is __SMP__ being phased out in favor of CONFIG_SMP? (that is what I would assume..)
Should I throw together a patch to do (basically) s/__SMP__/CONFIG_SMP? It seems as though the kernel at the very least consistently conditionally compile code.. (ack, alliteration!) I'd be happy to do it if someone (mec?) lets me know it's not stupid, in preparation for 2.4.
Also, since Java binary support has been deprecated in 2.2, can it be removed in 2.4? If so, I'm all over that too. :)
Chris Noe (stiker@northlink.com)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |