lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Support for ISL?
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Jeff Mcadams wrote:

> Thus spake Jason Hill
> >Is anyone currently working on adding support to 2.2.x (or for
> >2.3.x/2.4) for ISL encapsulation? This would be an incredibly useful
> >feature to the networking code.
>
> I'd rather see 802.1q than ISL. Even though I use ISL in a spot or two
> in my network...that's not long for the world...it was the only real
> option at the time...but being a Cisco proprietary thing...I'd rather
> not having developers wasting their time implementing it, and go ahead
> and do 802.1q

IIRC, 802.1q is now in almost all the Cisco switching software now, and I
wouldn't be too surprised if this fell into disuse over the next two
years.

Yes 802.1q would be where I would spend my cycles.

wfms


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.833 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site