Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] asm*/resource.h fix for glibc | Date | Thu, 16 Dec 1999 19:38:09 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <19991217011701.A23083@cistron.nl>, Miquel van Smoorenburg writes: +----- | According to Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: | > In message <83bn5f$923$1@enterprise.cistron.net>, Miquel van Smoorenburg | > writes: | > | If glibc-devel has /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux-2.2.5-20/include/ | linux | > | is there any reason not to put the 2.2.5-20 kernel headers directly | > | into /usr/include instead of via a symlink ? | > | > Because some of us upgrade our kernels without going through the whole RPM | > rigmarole and would prefer to be able to change one or two symlinks instead | > of copying all the headers? | | But you don't NEED to upgrade the kernel headers in /usr/include if | you upgrade the kernel. In fact that was the entire point of Linus' | posting. And mine. Sigh +--->8
When new ioctls etc. show up, we do. In particular, I'm running 2.2.13ac3 on RH5.2, so the old kernel includes (for 2.0.36) *are* wrong.
-- brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |