Messages in this thread | | | From | (david parsons) | Subject | Re: Kernels do not compile anymore | Date | 14 Dec 1999 02:04:23 -0800 |
| |
In article <linux.kernel.199912132231.PAA25423@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>, Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> wrote: >Richard B. Johnson writes: >[...] >> So, where is the real version of the kernel? > >ftp.kernel.org > >I realise it's frustrating when development kernels don't compile. >But, hey, they are development kernels after all. Use 2.2.x if you >want any promises.
It's probably better to produce a patch when the kernel won't compile, but surely it's better that when something goes belly up and stays dead that people should complain bitterly about it instead of just quietly shuffling off to the -ac stable branch.
____ david parsons \bi/ If people can't complain, it's stopped being a \/ development branch but is instread a research branch.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |