Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Dec 1999 01:44:31 -0500 (EST) | From | Michael Nelson <> | Subject | Re: Portable binary modules |
| |
I don't disagree... :).
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > [Michael Nelson] > > I am not trying to get in the middle of this > > (: > > > but I want to mention that they NOP out the spinlock codepaths in > > ntoskrnl.exe and hal.dll when you install/update a new kernel on a UP > > machine. > > I'm not impressed unless they also NOP out the lock calls from VXDs at > runtime. And even with NOPs you're talking about things you should > have compiled away, like chunks of cacheline and register allocations, > so I'm still not sure I'm impressed. > > Peter > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |