lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Portable binary modules
I don't disagree... :).

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Peter Samuelson wrote:

>
> [Michael Nelson]
> > I am not trying to get in the middle of this
>
> (:
>
> > but I want to mention that they NOP out the spinlock codepaths in
> > ntoskrnl.exe and hal.dll when you install/update a new kernel on a UP
> > machine.
>
> I'm not impressed unless they also NOP out the lock calls from VXDs at
> runtime. And even with NOPs you're talking about things you should
> have compiled away, like chunks of cacheline and register allocations,
> so I'm still not sure I'm impressed.
>
> Peter
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.089 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site