Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Nov 1999 00:25:48 +1100 | From | CaT <> | Subject | Re: the joy of scsi headers and glibc... |
| |
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 02:07:19PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >>>>> CaT writes: > > > Ok. this is beginning to confuse me. > > glibc install: > > > Note that `/usr/include/net' and `/usr/include/scsi' should *not* be > > symlinks into the kernel sources. GNU libc provides its own versions > > of these files. > > > kernel docs: > You mean Documentation/scsi-generic?
Yes. I remembered seeing something about this softlink before and went to look for it today. I also remembered that glibc supplied it's own and welll... am now going blub... blub... blub... :)
> I don't understand why people write such documentation without > contacting the glibc developers first. I've never seen such a request > from anybody regarding the scsi subdirectory. > > Instead of writing such lines, it would be better to try to find a > general solution. I kindly ask the author of this docu to get in > contact with me and tell me exactly the existing problems so that we > can fix this in glibc.
Hope this gets fixed. One way or the other. This confusion has currently disabled my burner... it thinks it's off and wont eject or enything. :)
-- CaT (cat@zip.com.au) URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null
'He had position, but I was determined to score.' -- Worf, DS9, Season 5: 'Let He Who Is Without Sin...'
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |