Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Nov 1999 21:51:35 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Accept() problem |
| |
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Otherwise, what you are describing is a well known problem with the > way Apache listens for new requests and is being addressed. You are > right that it requires support from the kernel and Apache at the same > time though.
there is no problem at all with Apache. Wake-one does not need any application-side change, this is a common misconception. [Apache does provide an optimization to avoid OS-level accept() inefficiencies, but that is a different issue and it can be turned on/off freely.] The wake-one implementation in 2.3 works automatically and works just fine.
-- mingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |