Messages in this thread | | | From | "David Schwartz" <> | Subject | RE: Reiserfs licencing - possible GPL conflict? | Date | Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:58:29 -0800 |
| |
> > > Also "integrated" means different things to different people, > including > > > lawyers. These different things have different consequences according > > > to the GPL's terms. > > > > I think it's very clear that "integrated" means a derived work > > (which is a very precise term under copyright law). If you can think > > of any other meaning, please offer it. > > Now, I know and you know that integration as not the same as > aggregation. But the below suggests that someone draws the line > differently. Why not just say "derived work"?
I don't think anyone but a computer software salesman would claim that aggregation and integration are the same.
DS
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |