lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: vfork
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Ed Hall wrote:

> As someone who has seen the hubris of numerous Unix vendors in assuming
> that portability isn't their problem--especially when it comes to
> documentation--it pains me when Linux folks take a similar tack. Looked
> at from the perspective of someone coming to Linux from elsewhere in
> the Unix world, your attitude looks downright hostile. Such attitudes
> belong on Slashdot, not here.

Don't take such opinions as representative of anyone other than the
individual that posted it (the same applies to my comment, although I do
think that people are generally not hostile to portability issues, rather
merely uninformed). Personally, I try to avoid writing non-portable code,
but the fact of the matter is that it's impossible to ensure that a piece
of code will work properly on an architecture that it hasn't been tested
on. That said, the fixes are usually pretty simple.

-ben


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.099 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site