lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: /proc/pci unknown devices
From
Date
>>>>> "Theodore" == Theodore Y Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> writes:

Theodore> From: miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) Date:
Theodore> 26 Oct 1999 10:52:55 +0200

> If it is discarded after boot, what about hot-plug PCI ?

Theodore> It's a good point, but we may end up wanting to use
Theodore> different mechanisms to deal with hot-plug devices versus
Theodore> devices detected on boot. Yes, it's best if as much of the
Theodore> code path is shared as possible, but there may be enough
Theodore> other differences with how we want to handle hot-plug PCI
Theodore> that this isn't an issue.

Actually, I came to think of this after posting to the list earlier
today. I take it that device drivers needs to be PCI hot-plug aware in
order to make them work in h-p environments? If this is the case, it
should be perfectly valid to require the h-p aware driver to keep the
PCI device info for it's device in the driver.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.041 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site