Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Intel E1000 server gig-card? | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Date | 26 Oct 1999 17:33:07 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "Jamie" == Jamie Lokier <lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk> writes:
Jamie> Jes Sorensen wrote: >> >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> writes: >> Jeff> If it really matters to you, you can always dual-license the Jeff> code, and let downstream developers pick which license they find Jeff> most suitable. >> Thats actually a bad approach IMHO, I would be willing to dual >> license certain bits of code. However, when doing so I would also >> put a strong encouragement statement in the code suggesting people >> to also dual license their changes.
Jamie> There's not much point dual licensing with BSD and GPL. It's Jamie> equivalent to the BSD license alone, so why be confusing about Jamie> it?
Because you want to make the point that you are a GPL person, but trying to be nice so the BSD people can use it as well. But right, it made more sense when BSD had the silly advertising clause.
Jes
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |