Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:14:09 -0400 | From | Peter Rival <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Binding processes to selected CPUs |
| |
Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 11:28:07AM +0200, avik@talmai.com wrote: > ... (Taxonomy of MP machines) > > > > All true, but I lack the facilities to measure the performance > > of my patch on a NUMA :( > > > > Does linux support a NUMA machine? > > I don't think Linux support for SPARC EnterpriseServer 10000 is > very good. It sure runs, but all these memory locality optimization > things are missing. DaveM could tell more. > > Sun has a few more alike boxes (as I understand them), for example > E 4500 series. >
In the tech article I just read from IEEE Micro one of the Sun engineers specifically called out the Starfire (UE10K) series, as well as the rest of the Ultra series as specifically UMA systems, not NUMA, let alone CC-NUMA. Seeing as I'm from Compaq and that may make people wary of my technical knowledge of Sun systems, I'll quote the article (by Alan Charlesworth, if the name means anything :) :
"As with the rest of the Ultra server family, Starfire's uniform-memory-access time is independent of the board where memory is located." (p. 41)
(note to self: stop sounding like you're still in college...*grumble*)
That sentence, as well as the rest of the surrounding text, definitely makes Starfire sound like it's UMA. And being that NUMA is one of my pet toys, I can tell you that adding memory locality support (like memory replication and/or relocation) is fun, but really hard to get right. If anyone wants, sometime soon we'll be shipping a new system that's quite happy to run NUMA. Just check out SKC, and look for "Wildfire". All I'm allowed to say is "fast...really fast". And yes, I've been poking people around here to clone a couple copies of Jay so we can have Linux support on the system.
Anyway, back to the topic...I'm going to go back to my Alpha-hasn't-booted-2.3-since-10-on-rawhide hole now and try to tackle some fun stuff. (Yes, that was a subtle hint for someone with more of a clue to correct me on that one).
- Pete
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |