Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 3 Jan 1999 20:50:11 +0000 (GMT) | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Subject | Re: [patch] ad1848.c and opl3sa2.c |
| |
On Sat, 2 Jan 1999, Andrew Kieschnick wrote:
> > These patches are against 2.2.0-pre3. > > ad1848.c: add back 2 lines that disappeared sometime after 2.1.131 so > CS4231 gets detected as CS4231 and not CS4248 > opl3sa2.c: report unknown chipset, but go ahead and act like its an > opl3sax. (Works for whatever flavor opl3sa I've got) <snip>
My OPL3SAX appears to have version number 7. I guess that the `version numbers' 1, 2 and 4 may actually be flag values, and that it might be reasonable to test them in the order 4, 2, 1 in order to identify the chip. Does that sound plausible?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |