lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: A router bug?
Date
> at least in my case, MTU sizes isn't the answer.  the reply packets are
> arriving. the kernel is losing them somewhere because they don't make it
> from ppp0 to eth0.

Thats what I would expect. That means the MTU size is the answer

> in the above situation, one can "fix" NT sites by forcing my ppp0 to an MTU
> of 576 and they'll work, but this isn't the answer to both situations.

See ?

> there -is- something wrong in the kernel.

I've yet to see a non masquerade trace set where this is the case.


Alan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.092 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site