lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Re[2]: empty_zero_page definition clash in 2.0.36

On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:

> > (just pedantic, but the right fix is to make it (char *) not (unsigned
> > char *), because this is how it was defined and used previously.
>
> Hmm, I also used signed at the beginning, but then looked into 2.2.0 sources and
> there it's unsigned...

it's inconsistent in 2.2 (look at the COMMAND_LINE deefine). But it doesnt
really matter, i said i'm pedantic :)

-- mingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.025 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site