lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Kernel Development Model, CVS, 2.2.0 and beyond
Date
From
In message <19990126141244.A217@pm-ppp124.triton.net>, Adam Scislowicz 
writes:
+-----
| Now would be a good time to move the kernel to a CVS tree. GNOME, Mozilla, GG
+--->8

You should see the horror-script I have to use to check things out from GNOME
anonymous CVS. CVS appears to have a *lot* of problems with submodules,
especially when sticky tags are involved but sometimes with ordinary HEAD
checkouts. Ugh. Of course, if we don't use submodules then it won't be a
problem... but I can think of a few things that might want to be submodules.
(ISDN?)

I suggest we move to something sensible instead of CVS. Please.

--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.149 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site