Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Kernel Development Model, CVS, 2.2.0 and beyond | Date | Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:45:32 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <19990126141244.A217@pm-ppp124.triton.net>, Adam Scislowicz writes: +----- | Now would be a good time to move the kernel to a CVS tree. GNOME, Mozilla, GG +--->8
You should see the horror-script I have to use to check things out from GNOME anonymous CVS. CVS appears to have a *lot* of problems with submodules, especially when sticky tags are involved but sometimes with ordinary HEAD checkouts. Ugh. Of course, if we don't use submodules then it won't be a problem... but I can think of a few things that might want to be submodules. (ISDN?)
I suggest we move to something sensible instead of CVS. Please.
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |