Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Jan 1999 22:56:19 -0500 (EST) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: ** Fork 1, Draft Final-2 ** |
| |
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Kyle R. Rose wrote:
> Yeah, I've been reading that. But what if it's fixed in 2.2.1? This is really a > judgment call -- include only things that are 100%, or include stuff that's almost > there. I'm not sure what the proper answer here is. What if NT 5.0 will be rock-solid? Wait... M$ claims exactly that. Oh, well... Guess it's a question of *whom* do we want to imitate.
> > *From* BSD, please. UNIX(tm) issues aside, none of the major > > How about "portions of BSD UNIX"? > > If BSD licenses the UNIX trademark, then it really is BSD UNIX, so as long as we
BSD can't license anything. CSRG is no more, {Free,Open,Net}BSD are in the same position as Linux, BSDI's website doesn't claim that BSD/OS is UNIX(tm). So there... Lawsuits were about code, not trademark. If you want to use formal names - use "Berkeley Software Distribution".
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |