Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: xconfig | Date | Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:01:03 +0000 | From | David Woodhouse <> |
| |
mec@shout.net said: > Please guys, focus your opinions as "this is why I like my favorite > look and feel for xconfig",
I once saw a research OS with a configuration utility based on xconfig.
It showed the dependencies for each config option next to them, sort of like LEDs so you could see the deps, and even click on them to change them.
For example...
-------------------------------------------------------------- | FAT filesystem | -------------------------------------------------------------- | VFAT filesystem O FAT | -------------------------------------------------------------- | MSDOS filesystem O FAT | -------------------------------------------------------------- | UMSDOS filesystem O MSDOS O EXPERIMENTAL | --------------------------------------------------------------
---- ---- ---- David Woodhouse David.Woodhouse@mvhi.com Office: (+44) 1223 810302 Project Leader, Process Information Systems Mobile: (+44) 976 658355 Axiom (Cambridge) Ltd., Swaffham Bulbeck, Cambridge, CB5 0NA, UK. finger dwmw2@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk for PGP key.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |