Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jan 1999 00:46:01 +0100 | From | Marc Espie <> | Subject | Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver) |
| |
In article <Pine.SOL.3.95.990116212706.19824B-100000@albert.math.psu.edu> you write: > > >On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Anthony Barbachan wrote: > >> I haven't been crazy with most of the changes in the new standard of C++ >> either, actually I oppose many of them, but just because they are there >> doesn't mean I'll be forced to use them either.
>Sorry, but it means that standard C++ is fundamentally broken. *If* one >has to avoid some features at any cost it means that you are advocating >usage of language different from C++. It may be a subset of C++, but it is >*not* C++ per se.
Have you been using trigraphs recently ? Do you feel forced to return structures in any program that you write ? Do you feel obliged to use scanf and locales in any programs that you write ?
Is C broken ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |