lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)
In article <Pine.SOL.3.95.990116212706.19824B-100000@albert.math.psu.edu> you write:
>
>
>On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Anthony Barbachan wrote:
>
>> I haven't been crazy with most of the changes in the new standard of C++
>> either, actually I oppose many of them, but just because they are there
>> doesn't mean I'll be forced to use them either.

>Sorry, but it means that standard C++ is fundamentally broken. *If* one
>has to avoid some features at any cost it means that you are advocating
>usage of language different from C++. It may be a subset of C++, but it is
>*not* C++ per se.

Have you been using trigraphs recently ?
Do you feel forced to return structures in any program that you write ?
Do you feel obliged to use scanf and locales in any programs that you
write ?

Is C broken ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.046 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site